Linda McMahon

The Liberty Score is a rating system assessing how closely an individual’s views align with core Libertarian principles. Scores are based on a 0-100 scale, with 100 representing a fully Libertarian position and 0 representing complete opposition to Libertarian values. The grading criteria include:

Personal Freedom (25 points): Support for individual rights in personal choices, including medical freedom, privacy, and bodily autonomy.
Economic Freedom (25 points): Advocacy for a free-market economy, low taxation, and minimal government interference in business.
Limited Government (25 points): Commitment to reducing the size and scope of government, limiting regulatory power, and upholding states’ rights.
Non-Intervention (25 points): Opposition to unnecessary foreign entanglements, support for a non-interventionist foreign policy, and minimal military presence abroad.

Each category will be scored, then averaged to form the individual’s overall Liberty Score, providing a clear snapshot of their alignment with Libertarian ideals. Grades are provided by AI

Secretary of Education

Status: Confirmed by Campaign

Liberty Score: 55

Warhawk Status: Neutral

Liberty Score Assessment:

Personal Freedom (15/25): Linda McMahon has expressed support for individual liberties, particularly in advocating for school choice, which aligns with Libertarian principles of personal freedom in education. However, her support for certain educational standards suggests a balanced approach between personal freedom and educational quality.
The Times
Economic Freedom (20/25): As a former CEO of WWE, McMahon has demonstrated support for free-market principles and minimal government intervention in business operations. Her advocacy for charter schools and privatization in education reflects a commitment to economic freedom within the educational sector.
Them
Limited Government (10/25): While promoting economic freedom, McMahon’s support for certain federal educational initiatives indicates a nuanced view on the size and role of government in education. Her involvement in the America First Policy Institute suggests a willingness to engage with government programs when beneficial.
New York Magazine
Non-Intervention (10/25): McMahon’s focus has primarily been on domestic policy, with limited public information on her views regarding foreign intervention. Her support for a strong national defense indicates a neutral stance on non-interventionist principles.

Bio:

Linda McMahon, co-founder and former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to serve as Secretary of Education. McMahon previously served as Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) from 2017 to 2019, where she focused on supporting small businesses and entrepreneurship. She also chaired the America First Policy Institute, a think tank promoting conservative policies. McMahon’s nomination reflects an emphasis on school choice and reducing federal oversight in education.

Career Highlights:

Co-founder and CEO of WWE: Led the company to become a global entertainment powerhouse, overseeing its growth and expansion.
Administrator of the Small Business Administration (2017–2019): Advocated for small businesses, implementing policies to enhance their growth and sustainability.
Chair of America First Policy Institute: Promoted conservative policies, focusing on economic growth and national security.
Political Involvement: Ran for U.S. Senate in Connecticut in 2010 and 2012, emphasizing economic development and job creation.

About the Secretary of Education Role:

The Secretary of Education oversees the U.S. Department of Education, which administers federal assistance to schools, conducts educational research, and enforces federal educational laws regarding privacy and civil rights. This role involves shaping national education policy, promoting educational excellence, and ensuring equal access to education. McMahon’s business acumen and experience in government administration are expected to influence her approach to education reform, with a focus on expanding school choice and reducing federal intervention in local education systems.